InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 275
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/14/2005

Re: jaime9_2000 post# 7805

Friday, 10/21/2005 11:38:19 AM

Friday, October 21, 2005 11:38:19 AM

Post# of 10733
Jaime Writes: ""For example, we would all feel better if he said something like this: "Last week, we confidently anticipated that the audited financials would be released by today. Since then, we have discovered that there is an honest dispute between our audit versus the independent auditor.""

Okay, here's why he can't:

If he DID release that "explanation" as you has stated. the investors would be left with thinking the independent auditor's numbers must be a LOT lower than NAUG's previously released numbers. Obviously NOBODY in NAUG management is going to argue about numbers that mate up perfectly or even exceed numbers they have posted in the past.

For Scott to offer your explanation, all he would be doing is offering you a negative, ambiguous, investor-emotional situation to some sterile, fact-based numerical data that is void of any and all emotion.

I say "no" to that idea. Just wait and release whatever the best possible numbers are (after the two parties negotiate the totals) and let the chips fall where they may.

If the numbers DO pan out ...then it doesn't really matter if NAUG is at $2 or if the investors are emotionally drained. It will start going up from that point on. True, it won't be starting from $5 or $6 (had NAUG management had their act together) ...but at least it's a start.

EPROM



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y