Silver Falcon Mining Inc. (fka SFMI)

[Imperial Whazoo]

Yeah, well, not so much, LOL because I made a typo.

Here is what I inadvertantly said followed by what I intended to have said:
"to get only 100% placer claims in place, and to get as many of them as possible.

Instead of the paltry and sometimes miniscule percentages that were involved in the situation at the point where the deal between PQ & the Chinese was cut, we now have a uniform situation which involves places claims, greater numbers of claims, greater amounts of acerage, and 100% ownerships."

Should have been:

to get only 100% LODE claims in place, and to get as many of them as possible.

Instead of the paltry and sometimes miniscule percentages that were involved in the situation at the point where the deal between PQ & the Chinese was cut, we now have a uniform situation which involves LODE claims, greater numbers of claims, greater amounts of acerage, and 100% ownerships.

My bad.

But my point is that a fraud would never have involved all of the money spent to get all of the claims in hand as 100% owned LODE claims. And furthermore, if any criminal engaged in a fraud, where he could have walked away with a pocketful of money, it logically defies reason to have that fraudster spending vast sums to do this kind of claims-control deal.

I mean, any self respecting criminal is going to spend as little as possible so he can walk away with as much as possible.

And wrapping up all of this property was expensive, which thus, IN AND OF ITSELF, repudiates any fraud representations.

If you are engaging in the fraud claimed to be going on, why throw away so much of the money you would otherwise be walking away with?

Its just irrational to see the list of 100% owned LODE claims they have built up, and then to argue that we are looking at fraud where a family illicitly intends to feather itts nest only, and to do so at the expense of the ordinary shareholder.

Its just not a rational position to hold, IMHO.

Hope this helps.

Imperial Whazoo