sorry barge,
I don't dwell here much, indeed, the whole PP thing completely slipped by me.
Again. I equate you and awk, because you offer identity.
You both describe things many believe to be necessary and somehow leap to or imply that they are then sufficient.
Yes, in order for WAVX to succeed their must be a move towards trusted computing. Duh. Yes, MSFT has been moving for several OS upgrade cycles now towards TC. Duh. Yes, if these things were not happening, then WAVX would be toast.
Got it. Some things that any fool could have said 5 or 10 years ago must happen appear to be continuing to happen. NOTED.
So what?
Yes, the earth spins, MSFT moves steadily to TC. Got it.
Yes, Wave hopes to somehow sell something. Cool. Got it. But where is the place for big thinking here? That one subscribe to your convolution that the presence of necessary events suddenly constitutes sufficiency?
I find your necessary events boring. Yes, they are necessary, but by their nature, necessary events are boring.
The question is what is sufficient to generate appreciation of WAVX. You do not, and have never, touched on that (at least rationally).
You, and awk. Perhaps I should just say bawk or barawk.
Yes. These companies rely on some combination of metal, plastic, and electricity. And yes, MSFT is moving towards TC (as they have been for a long time). Cool.
And WAVX is doing a PP (in case you didn't notice barawk) with a rather FAT warrants component.
Have you ever asked yourself if you will still actually own any WAVX when it is all said and done?
The above content is my opinion.
AI
