Thanks for the quasi accurate translation
a) Barrick lost all points of contention in a 3 - 0 judges decision
b) This forces Barrick to comply with AMARILLOS SUR - NORTE title exhibit (they sued me in Canada and won in shame and larceny, avoiding my presence in Canada courts all times, but at BC SUPREME COURT from where ABX fled in lies that 2006 Judgment was a fraud. It was not a fraud, Barrick´s lies at 2010 Judgment were a fraud, now caught and about to hit the dust,
c) The titles are under my name never Barrick by name, injunction over them, they are in default now....
d)Ignoring the facts shall increase their chances of convictions when they are unable to produce clean title again.
e) These matters are part of the ventilation of striking out LAC MINERALS 1994 areas sold to ABX as MINA PASCUA PROSPECTUS in Chile - the original transaction and Prospectus defaced by ABX worldwide and at SEC + OSC filings.
f) Now we expect the counterparts to be unale to produce title as lied in Canada Courts 2002-2012 and Chile Courts 2011-2012.
All lies of ABX to SEC + TSX7OSC + BCSC + RCMP/IMET + v. MWR/MSX shall be enforced to the end.
Crimes of ABX v. Banks, Exchanges, Royalties illegally sold, Silver Ponzi scam of Pascua in connection and assistance of SILVER WHEATON are bound to collapse at law.
Barrick is urged to give up MINA PASCUA CHILE fraud at OSC/TSX to admit that ABX sued in crime v. Jorge Lopehandia 2002-2012, to solely COVERUP their lack of clean title at MINA PASCUA CHILE.
Barrick is actually LAC MINERALS in Chile, its executives and owners, own Barrick and PASCUA LAMA at this date never changed rrally...
LAC v. CORTONA jurisprudence v. Barrick by Jorge Lopehandia, thus, is 100% applicable as called v. ABX 2000 to date.
Greg Panagos, Peter Munk and all Barrick´s dirty oinsiders with a finger at PASCUA a.k.a. PASCUA LAMA PONZI SCAM are challenged to fight or disprove these facts at RCMP-IMET v. Jorge Lopehandia, loser goes to jail.
Barrick, a shame of criminal financial terrorists and financial markets manipulators cesspool.
Challenged to prove its lawsuit v. Jorge Lopehandia in Canada 2002 - 2012 is not a machiavelic larceny and theft dirty set of illegal actions to COVERUP Mina Pascua theft. Eh? titleless ABX?
AI
