InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: downsideup post# 58522

Wednesday, 10/10/2012 3:44:45 PM

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:44:45 PM

Post# of 60937
I believe the fact "that he WAS allocated the 1/10th of 1% interest in 923" is proof of the fact that the deal went through. Diac had an interest in the patent prior to the final settlement. He gave up all of it as part of the deal. But in order to not go rounds again over being a "real party in interest" in the litigation he was granted a nominal share to allow him to remain an active party. I am not really sure how you are interpreting that any other way.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.