InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1069
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/08/2010

Re: sunspotter post# 46321

Thursday, 10/04/2012 12:46:48 PM

Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:46:48 PM

Post# of 94141
Actually it would be very easy in law to prove that Robert is not an employee, since it is spelled out right there. These terms are not vague, they have very specific meanings. That is the entire purpose of these documents, to remove any ambiguity. It even says he is not a director or officer.

And there is no reason whatsoever for the AMF to restrict Robert. The only person they had any interest in whatsoever was Andrew and even in his case it was not for anything he was directly accused of but more for his connection to the main people named in there who did have accusations spelled out for them. Naming Robert in there would be like naming UL or Design1st or the lab they used or the factory in China... I am really looking forward to the next AMF meeting so this whole mess can be put to bed.