InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 464
Posts 7524
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2010

Re: grego68 post# 32150

Saturday, 09/29/2012 11:56:52 AM

Saturday, September 29, 2012 11:56:52 AM

Post# of 167964
INACTIVITY AT CINCO MINAS NOT SUPPORTED BY BGL VIDEOS

Aside from the obvious "spying" from a mile away, a closer look at the videos (especially 3 and others of roads) actually disprove BGL's claim that there is no activity at Cinco Minas and that SRGE are not there.

People must keep in mind that the region has a distinct rainy season from June to October, so if there were inactivity for years as claimed by BGL, the roads would not be able to sustain the prominent tire marks left by traffic to/from. The effect of precipitation--such as rain--on untraveled roads (dirt or unpaved) is actually a plane that has an uneven, lumpy bump look.

The indents of the roads created by traffic in this case is too prominent to rule out inactivity.

If BGL spies are able to get closer to the mills without getting shot, we would like to see roads at the entrance of CMM. One has to really wonder why BGL are using cheap (more laughable) tactics to discredit SRGE ownership and activity at Cinco Minas.