InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1829
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: VBgood post# 17139

Friday, 09/21/2012 10:17:29 AM

Friday, September 21, 2012 10:17:29 AM

Post# of 26631
nice little argument. Inmet's offer underpins the PP. They would be required by law to take over the debt. Unfortunately that argument breaks down right away since Inmet has already made "no PP" a condition precedent for the offer. If there is a PP then no valid offer exists.

Simple thing would be for PTQ to get the PP put in place. That would instantly kill the hostile takeover offer that is coming.

So what's taking the PP so long? It's been over 2 months. I wonder if PTQ announced the PP as a defense to the hostile takeover offer that they saw coming from Inmet. Certainly the timeline is about right. Supposedly six month ago was when Inmet knew that PTQ was not going to play ball and ran to the President to intervene. Maybe that is when Inmet started thinking hostile takeover.

Pressure is on PTQ to get that PP in place before the offer is made to the shareholders. Who knows, maybe some of those big shareholders that participated in the dollar PP are disgruntled with Fifer's handling of the company and their investment dollars. They may just want to roll their investment over into Inmet if they feel their investment would be be better manged over there.

JFF7

It's better to be out wishing you were in than in wishing you were out.

"Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent". - John Maynard Keynes

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.