![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, September 21, 2012 8:55:25 AM
Sure, it's been ~10 years and here we are at ~22 cents.
There is plenty to be disappointed about but from an IPO at ~20 bucks, an all time high of ~23 bucks we are certainly "at the bottom" from an investment viewpoint.
Let's play "Guess the Bottom" at this point is silly as we are here.
Anyone invested here today should be here because of the future of Liquidmetal Technologies, not because they are waiting for 19 cents or 11 cents or 10 cents to jump in.
If things progress the way we all want them to and LQMT puts a few deals in place, we will be trading over a dollar or more and then blue skies from there.
If we are all being taken for a ride and LQMT crashes, burns and drops sub penny as a result, we all lose everything so what difference does it make where one "jumps in" unless you're a "penny flipper" and playing the fluctuations between this penny and the next one.
Let's not forget the 176 page S-1 that no one talks about any more, there's a reason for that document being so in depth and I doubt that reason is to pull a fast one on us investors but more likely the first of many more in depth reports/filings/documents to come as Liquidmetal grows from here to the future goal of relisting on the Nasdaq in the future.
Additionally, this sales partnership with Materion is HUGE, obviously Materion sees something in LQMT that has big potential or they would not have made the committment to sell Liquidmetal alloys to their existing customers. Materion doesn't need LQMT.
Lastly, Apple. Who the heck knows exactly what's going on there, but 20MM is 20MM and that's a lot of money regardless of the fact to Apple it doesn't seem to be, someone authorized the issuance of that check and that someone is accountable for it.
The resigned contract extension with Apple was also done for a reason (again, who the heck knows what that reason is) and although I follow Liquidmetal as closely as any one else, I STILL don't understand this "In Perpetuality" thing with respect to the contract. If it's "In Perpetuality" than why does the contract have dates attached to it, why not just sign one forever contract?
Recent LQMT News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/20/2024 08:11:00 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 08:49:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/09/2024 09:05:11 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/21/2023 10:15:45 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/21/2023 10:26:27 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/10/2023 08:37:18 PM
FEATURED ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM