InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,654.32
(
1.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,947.60
(
1.37%
)
Dow Jones
40,228.46
(
1.19%
)
Brent Oil
84.77
(
-0.41%
)
Bitcoin
58,192.44
(
1.48%
)
Post# of 80403
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Devil196

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 1190
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/18/2011

Devil196

Re: None

Monday, 08/20/2012 2:47:31 PM

Monday, August 20, 2012 2:47:31 PM

Post# of 80403
So the CEO says they have pulled the patent because they do not want others to get the information. Well lets see now, what happens when a disgrunteled employee passes the non patented information to someone else and then this outside entity patents the technology or whatever it is for themselves.

Sounds risky to me. Maybe we should consider that the patent was pulled because in reality nothing exists to be patented. No, this could never happen with an OTC company....right?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up