InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 7755
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 02/20/2002

Re: Conrad post# 35724

Saturday, 08/18/2012 3:12:39 PM

Saturday, August 18, 2012 3:12:39 PM

Post# of 47155
Hi Conrad

While I see some issues with Ocroft's method they are not as bad as you suggest.

1) He identifies a stock he wants

2) He pretends he buys it and pretends he buys more on each AIM directed buy

3) When it moves up in to the hold zone (after a directed buy) or the actual first sell (I forget which) he then institutes an AIM directed buy

So it would be like a stock dropping from 100 to 50 in one month and doing the buy instead of having a lot of little buys along the way.

Of course you might miss some AIM sells along the way, but I think if you would have gotten a sell that would have been a buy point for him.

4) If a stock reverses and goes back down, you wait again to purchase more till it goes up.

5) You wait to sell anything till it goes down from a high instead of selling along the way.

Like I said, it might not be perfect, and I may not like it, but it is not as bad as you think.

Toofuzzy

Take the road less traveled. It will make all the difference.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.