InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 540
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/26/2011

Re: WithCatz post# 374430

Sunday, 08/05/2012 7:51:32 AM

Sunday, August 05, 2012 7:51:32 AM

Post# of 737855
Quote ( the settlement included agreement to pay the fees. Several points about this were made. With the Equity Committee also part of that settlement, including the fee part, there was effectively agreement across all the parties in the settlement.)

Catz I agree with you on 99% of your past posts. This one I don't.Yes they all agreeded on the settlement ( they all need to be scrubbed with Lysol, and a wire brush ).This would support your theory except for the fact that a legitimate objection was made by a shareholder.Forget all the garbage of the limo, meals, hotel rooms etc. The point of the 24 hour billing was easy for her to be fair, and reasonable, and clawback those charges.So your point that everyone agreed is not really 100% correct.If all that was needed was that the partys were in agreement than why did she even entertain the shareholders objection. By her hearing the objection made it her duty to put her rubber stamp away, and be reasonable. Sure I'm talking pennys after all the billions were stolen,but there has to be a point when honest dealing has to be considered.
Ok Catz my rant is done, and except for my pocketbook I feel better.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News