Ladies & Gentlemen, introducing, our ticket to success.
Very seldom a party may be able to glee and gloat, thanks to someone's demise.
BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION and its worldwide subsidiaries, did just that in the case of MINA PASCUA ownership and owners treatment.
MINA PASCUA ownership, wishes to respond to BARRICK'S attacks against Jorge Lopehandia, Brent Johnson, MSX shareholders and the MSX corporate BOD, as follows:
TOP 100 - LIST OF LEGAL FACTS OF BARRICK GOLD AT MINA PASCUA CHILE - a.k.a. PASCUA LAMA PONZI SCHEEME by ABX
1. No titles to AMARILLOS 1-3000 (LAC 1994 concessions) registered in Barrick's name.
2. No legal authority to mine Gold from SERNAGEOMIN Chile at AMARILLOS 1-3000
3. AMARILLOS 1-3000 ready to be extinguished beneath TESOROS superposed 2001-2012.
4. In Chile a mining property dies after being superpositioned 4 years. LAC 1994 areas have been for 7 years by TESOROS.
5. No legally binding authority over TESOROS via MINERA NEVADA SpA exists (ABX SEC 6K, 2011, Pascua Lama owner)
6. No legally binding authority over TESOROS via MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA exists (Pascua Lama protocol owner).
7. Both corporations in 5. and 6. above, in court, had no clean title to TESOROS, it simply DID NOT EXIST.
8. Both corporations in 5. and 6. above, had only "word of mouth Agreements" with HECTOR UNDA LLANOS (TESOROS).
9. The above nullifies Barrick's pseudo "victory" in Appeals Court 2007 as published by Stockwatch 2011.
10. The above nullifies Barrick's 2010 Judgment victory at C-1912-2001 as published many times.
11. The above means BCSC's stance towards MSX in defence of BARRICK was violating MSX's rights due to ABX falsehoods.
12. The above leaves all Barrick's historical publications v. MSX+Lopehandia, as intentional fraud via press and media.
13. The above leaves the direct letter of BARRICK to MSX, March 2011 as fraud, extorsion and intimidation without reason.
14. The above denies Barrick a Gold permit at Pascua with AMARILLOS 1-3000 (salts & nitrates) by SERNAGEOMIN 2004/2012.
15. The above leaves Barrick's SEC filings outlawed and PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL null & void 2004-2012.
16. The above proves the PASCUA PROSPECTUS entered by Barrick 1997 at TSE (TSX) is now illegal and flawed or false.
17. In Canada it is a criminal offense to enter a false Prospectus.
18. The above leaves SILVER WHEATON - BARRICK - PASCUA Chile Silver sales, as a PONZI SCHEEME, no delivery by ABX.
19. The above leaves all daily trades with MINA PASCUA PONZI as Civil Rico act trades, daily at SLW and ABX @ Pascua.
20. The above confirms as valid A. G.S. Hultman/Jorge Lopehandia complaint to BCSC re: SLW-Barrick fraud at Pascua, 2009.
21. The above confirms as valid the indication of SRK at SLW's 43101, "no Chile titles were shown by ABX at Pascua".
22. The above denies Andy lloyd, Vincent Borg, Aaron Regent, Peter Munk, Panagos, Skolkasky, Patrick Garver, Randall Oliphant et al at Barrick Canada, USA and Chile, the right to call MINA PASCUA theirs.
23. Barrick is anticipated to also NOT HAVE AT HAND, the titles AMARILLOS SUR or AMARILLOS NORTE of Villar (Lopehandia).
24. Lack of AMARILLOS SUR & NORTE makes Barrick worldwide Internet libel symbol, not Jorge Lopehandia's name.
25. Barrick is challenged to publish on its name the AMARILLOS SUR - AMARILLOS NORTE or forfeit Lopehandia's libel lawsuit as fraud.
26. Barrick and subsidiaries have been caught in Chile and Canada spreading false information at Courts and media worldwide.
27. BNN lied on Barrick's behalf that most of the Gold was in Argentina, when most Gold is in Chile. (big Glaciers, Argentina mostly).
28. Stockwatch lied that Barrick won Appeals 2007, and Court decision 2010 regarding TESOROS. Today is all an invented fraud.
29. TSX defended Barrick until MWR(MSX) had to leave. MSX should seek reparations, retractions and compensations from all parties involved, to protect its shareholders from being legally ambushed as done by ABX and exchanges, thus far.
30. RCMP - IMET did not want to investigate, convinced that Barrick owned Pascua with MINERA NEVADA S.A. 2012, It does not.
31. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL published December 11, 2004 is thus, null & void by inclusion of LAC'S salts and nitrates concessions.
32. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL is null & void by inclusion in crime, of TESOROS concessions AS IF property of M. N LIMIATADA-ABX.
33. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL is null & void by illegal inclution of TESOROS in violation of Injunction C-1912-2001 from 2001 to date.
34. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL violations shall destroy Barrikc's EIS, and Chile approvals.
35. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL mining property as published December 11, 2004 at DIARIO OFICIAL DE CHILE, is now a fraud of ABX.
36. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL is not able to be mined for Gold by or via LAC 1994 salt & nitrates concessions. Chilean legislation.
37. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL listed MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA, 2004 owner of TESOROS concessions (HECTOR UNDA LLANOS).
38. HECTOR UNDA LLANOS indicated up to 2010 Judgment that "he had nothing to do with MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA or SpA.
39. HECTOR UNDA LLANOS 2011 indicates at Vallenar court 2011, to have received 1995 cash to claim TESOROS and LEGAL mandate from MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA (born only by 2000) and from MINERA NEVADA SpA (born only after years of the deposed date).
40. At Santiago Appeals 2012, UNDA LLANOS does not know ABX, at Vallenar trial 2012, Unda Llanos is ABX employee.
41. At 6k, March 2011 ABX owns TESOROS concessions filed as owned via MINERA NEVADA SpA.
42. At Chile Courts, both MINERA NEVADA SpA and LIMITADA, declared never to have owned TESOROS so ABX Prospectus lies.
43. It is a crime to alter, to change or to peddle a false Public Coporation Prospectus at any Exchange in Canada.
44. MINA PASCUA PROSPECTUS - TSE as subscribed 1994, ammended 1997, is not real or correct legal tender for ABX 2012.
44, In 2012, MINA PASCUA PROSPECTUS or PASCUA LAMA, are not legal tender, not as published at PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL 2004.
45. BARRICK'S letter 2011 to MWR (formerly MSX) become 2012 a falsehood and libel if not fraud, in light of the new evidence.
46. BARRICK'S Stockwatch publications v. MWR, MSX and Jorge Lopehandia, become eggregious, libelous, ill thought falsehoofs.
47. Barrick South America re publication in March 2012 of Barrick's December 21, 2011; is libel by ABX to MSX, contemptuous at law.
48. Barrick still has to produce AMARILLOS SUR & NORTE titles v. Lopehandia for Canada lawsuit to be real and not fraud, 2002-2012.
49. Barrick sued for Internet libel to Jorge Lopehandia in Canada. ABX said it owned AMARILLOS SUR & NORTE in facts 9)
50. Barrick's lack of AMARILLOS SUR & NORTE titles 2001-2012, leaves Barrick as prime INTERNET LIBEL candidate in Canada 2012.
51. ABX closed and continued not opening PASCUA since the year 2000 until 2014, "due to low Gold prices".
52. ABX spends in Africa today, USD600+ per Gold oz.
53. ABX has redefined PASCUA 2012 as a minus USD150 Gold oz. cost, mine and project thanks to its Silver, Copper & Mercury credits.
54. ABX Chile lawyers placed MINA PASCUA as being SOUTH of Lopehandia areas of litigation. (ROYALTY GOLD 2009)
55. ABX Positioned PASCUA LAMA for SILVER WHEATON as being NORTH EAST of Lopehandia's areas of litigation, (SRK 2010).
56. ABX has been lambasted by ROYALTY GOLD this week 2012 for extending the PASCUA LAMA fiasco opening until 2014.
57. ABX promised to open Pascua 1997 by1994. After Lopehandia title problem 1997, Prospectus was deferred 3 years to 2000.
58. ABX aborted 1997 opening, financed 500 million 1997 to open PASCUA MINE in Chile 2000. No Lama, Veladero or Glaciers farce.
50. ABX contacted by Lopehandia at law, closes Pascua and manipulates Gold, promising to open Pascua 2003 or if Gold USD 300/oz.
51. ABX receives C-1912-2001 injunction June 05, 2001 valid to date impeaching TESOROS.
52. ABX receives CRIMINAL action in Chile Feb 2002, 1160-2002; called, were Peter Munk, Randall Oliphant, Patrick Garver, V. Borg.
53. ABX sues late 2002 Jorge Lopehandia in Canada for Internet libel, claiming to own PASCUA LAMA with AMARILLOS SUR & NORTE
54. ABX lost TESOROS ordered to die at law by 2006 Judgment issued by Justice, MARIA ISABEL REYES KOKICH.
55. ABX Chile subsidiares, desperate, sued the Judge in Appeals Court 2007, it, elevates matters to SUPREME COURT OF CHILE
56. ABX Canada 2007 claims ABSOLUTE fraud in Chile (over TESOROS wranglings), suspends BC Supreme Court v. Lopehandia.
57. ABX Chile lost at SUPREME COURT 2008 its 2007 Appeal that became null & void. No victory was true for ABX at APPEALS COURT.
58. ABX fast claimed victory at Appeals 2007 v MSX, Lopehandia and promised to open Pascua fast or shortly thereafter.
59. ABX was negated by HECTOR UNDA LLANOS at Pascua decision 2010. Titles remain at Jorge Lopehandia's hands via C-192-2001
60. ABX 2011 claimed ABSOLUTE VICTORY 2010 in CHILE recovered TESOROS and gets exchanges regulators to agree with it v. MSX.
61. ABX Chile subsidiaries MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA (PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL) and MINERA NEVADA SpA - ABX SEC + OSC negate BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION the legal right to call MINA PASCUA CHILE or TESOROS an asset of ABX, in Vallenar 2012.
62. RCMP - IMET letter of 2006 to Jorge Lopehandia becomes negated, as Barrick does not own PASCUA via MINERA NEVADA S.A.
63. TSE - TSX stance to protect Barrick Gold Corporation is thus negated at law by the evidence regarding PASCUA property fraud.
64. ABX unable to mine Gold with LAC'S concessions unless SERNAGEOMIN licenses AMARILLOS 1-3000 2004-2012. 0% chances.
65. ABX sold PASCUA LAMA Royalties from Chile, in areas that are not legal property to ABX to issue Bank paid royalties on them.
66. ABX was Chile permitted to mine Pascua 1994-2001 until inventing the Argemtina side fiasco, impeaching Chile permits to date.
67. BNN 2011 defended Barrick, that the Gold was mostly in Argentina and shorted MWR (MSX) illegally thanks to Barrick's lies.
68. There has been overt market manipulation by Barrick Gold Corporation to obstruct MSX business with Jorge Lopehandia.
69. ABX has done it before to Jorge Lopehandia and MSX is feeling the blunt of Barrick's efforts to destroy Mina Pascua owner.
70. MSX believes that BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION will not be able to properly respond at law, this list of Pascua deficiencies.
71. Concessions named at Pascua Lama Protocol, that are part of AMARILLOS 1-3000 also must be erased by ABX from its books.
72. ABX Canada lawsuit v. Lopehandia is criminally flawed and oriented, it, should be overturned on legal merits, facts as of now.
73. ABX Mining property in the Chile side of PASCUA LAMA is completely flawed and some, criminally filed at OSC - SEC, in fraud.
74. ABX is unable today to verify that its PASCUA MINE PROSPECTUS 1994-2012 is not criminally flawed.
75. ABX is unable to verify today that its PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL 2004-2012 is 100% backed with clean titles in Chile.
76. ABX is unable to prove that its PASCUA LAMA Prospectus is inded not, a fiasco, a Ponzi Scheeme a fraud, or all of the above.
77. ABX is unable to prove as valid and legal TSX-OSC Exchange property or tender, at TESOROS or PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL.
78. ABX is unable to prove as valid and legal NYSE SEC Exchange property or tender, at TESOROS or PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL.
79. All of the above plus court documents and legal letters, exonerates JR Lopehandia,, from ABX libel as done in persecution,
80. All of the above plus court documents and legal letters, exonerates MSX, from ABX libel as done in illegal persecution, to date.
81. All of the above plus court documents and legal letters, exonerates Brent Johnson, from ABX libel as done, in persecution.
81. ABX Chile planned appeaL in Santiago, must decide which legal lie of HECTOR UNDA LLANOS suits best Barrick's fraud in Chile.
82. ABX chances of victorious Appeal at TESOROS trial in Chile, were 0% in 2010 and are thus 0%. by 2012.
82. ABX chances of victorious Appeals to strike out of AMARILLOS 1-3000 are 0% at Chilean Mining Legislation.
83. ABX chances of proving its PASCUA LAMA to ROYALTY GOLD equals PASCUA LAMA to LAC 1994, RCMP, SLW, Chile EIS, are 0%
84. ABX chances of proving its PASCUA LAMA PROSPECTUS as valid, legal and not flawed to OSC - TSX are 0%.
85. ABX chances of proving its PASCUA LAMA PROSPECTUS as valid, legal, and not flawed to SEC - NYSE are 0%
86. Barrick withdrew financing from EBD as it knew that MSX would call its flawed filings, illegal Pascua fraud evidence and proof.
87. Barrick is encouraged to update its PASCUA Mine Chile and PASCUA LAMA, applicable, legal material facts.
88. Barrick is herein denounced as tampering and having altered its SEC NYSE books and filings 1997-2012 at Pascua Prospectus.
89. Barrick is herein denounced as tampering and having altered its TSX OSC books and filings 1997-2012 at Pascua Prospectus.
90. Barrick is hereby denounced as engaged in illegal financial market activity worldwide. Protected by its auditors 1997-2012.
91. All maps provided by Barrick at PASCUA LAMA do not coincide with the reality on the ground, or Pascua's location in Chile.
92. ABX TSX - OSC books and filings 1997-2012 are to be changed, modified and corrected to suit the legal reality 2012 above.
93. ABX NYSE - SEC books and filings 1997-2012 are to be changed, modified and corrected to suit the legal reality 2012 above.
94. PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL filings are to be changed, modified and forfeited of AMARILLOS 1-3000 and TESOROS concessions.
95. ABX owes an apology, retraction, restitution and compensation for damages to Jorge Lopehandia 1996-2012.
96. ABX owes an apology, retraction, restitution and compensation for damages to Mountainstar Gold formerly MWR, 2010-2012
97. ABX owes an apology, retraction, restitution and compensation for damages to Brent Johnson the executive, 2010-2012
98. ABX owes an apology, retraction, compensation for damages to World Exchanges and conned regulators,1996-2012
99 ABX owes an apology, retraction, restitution and compensation for damages to banks & clients worldwide 1996-2012.
100 ABX owes an apology, retraction, restitution and compensation for damages to Chile and Argentina at Pascua, 1996-2012
Normally and exchange needs only "reasonable doubt to investigate a public company for illegal market activity".
MSX has now provided legal information beyond resonable doubt, well documented and demonstrable of ABX Mina Pascua fraud.
ABX is challenged to prove the opposite as truth, to make good on its press and exchange's filed errors or lies, 1996-2012 re: Pascua.
TSX - SEC and RCMP are hereby challenged to follow the law and law enforce Barrick's crimes v. MSX and Jorge Lopehandia.
MSX will seek safe harbor worldwide for MSX shareholders from ABX predatory tactics and legal, press, exchange's attacks.
MSX has reviewed the legal information that proves Barrick Gold Corporation libeled Jorge Lopehandia and MSX at Pascua fraud.
MSX has a duty to make these material facts known, for the benefit of investment public, authorites, ABX shareholders and banks.
MSX and its shareholders, will follow every legal avenue at their disposal to obtain justice v. Barrick Gold Corporation et al.
AI
