InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 834
Posts 119891
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: OakesCS post# 4773

Friday, 07/20/2012 3:07:58 PM

Friday, July 20, 2012 3:07:58 PM

Post# of 29408
WSJ says SLB doesn’t deserve premium valuation relative to HAL/BHI:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444097904577537184059073596.html

The main source of worry has been… "severe margin deterioration" as companies have moved drilling rigs away from gas fields amid low prices to those producing more oil or related liquids. As equipment shortages have eased, so has pricing power.

In other words, the shale-gas bonanza is fading for service firms. A quick glance at Schlumberger's performance versus more domestically oriented peers shows that this has been taken into account and then some. Though its shares are off 22% since August, rivals Halliburton Co. and Baker Hughes Inc., which generate more than half their sales from North America, are both down nearly twice as much.

Having already started out with a healthy valuation premium, that leaves investors paying too much for Schlumberger
, relatively speaking. On current-year profit expectations, which already reflect the weakness in North America, Schlumberger trades at 16.4 times earnings versus 9.5 times for Halliburton and 11.9 times for Baker Hughes.

CLB has an ever higher P/E ratio than SLB, but it’s a somewhat different kind of company.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.