I used to think that they would release it before "a few weeks" were up as well, thinking they put that in to cover their butts instead of setting a definitive date for release.
However, since then I have formed the opinion that they mean we will get it filed in a few weeks, being old math, a few means more than a couple; ie more than 2.
Since there track record indicates that they have a hard time filing on time, never mind early that would put the Q release no sooner than next Monday (3.5 trading days) the 23rd.
I will be amazed and very suprised to see it sooner, heck even Rocketman gave us a time frame yesterday of 3-7 days, which again puts us at Monday at the latest; which of course assumes they have mended their ways in regards to timely filings.
Since I am running low on posts I will address your earlier post:
That is an interesting take: greater possibility of releasing erronious info. However, I don't think scuba or myself or anyone else for that matter was implying we wanted a structured (daily/weekly)and or detailed accountng of what was going on, on site in either location.
Personally I can see a difference in a PR designed to generate interest to a wider audience and an update to shareholders posted on their website; kinda like they did with the video's and pictures.
After all it's not like they sent the video's out in a pr designed to generate intrest to anyone other than those already interested in sney.
I think I was more suprised at the out right hostility the idea generated than anything else, it took a few posts but it finally came out that the idea was dismissed outright, not on the merits of reason, but because of the poster that brought up the idea.
