InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 5640
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2003

Re: big M post# 30319

Wednesday, 09/14/2005 4:19:46 PM

Wednesday, September 14, 2005 4:19:46 PM

Post# of 341667
Big M,

The number of shares a company has is, in itself, not a single parameter able to disqualify a company.

On this board, Sirius, which, not so long ago, was a vastly underrated company, and, on another plane, Sun Microsystems, were referred to as obvious examples of companies that had issued a huge numbers of shares, but that has not stopped either company from achieving a colossal market cap or stopped either of those two companies from becoming the market leader in its own field.

I am sincerely amazed that you can take such a flagrantly one-dimensional view of what makes or breaks the market's perception of a company.

It would seem to follow from your one-sided reasoning that all it would take to get a far higher market cap for SunnComm would be, for instance, a 1 for 100 or 1 for a thousand reverse split to make SunnComm the toast of the market. I just wonder how many posters on this board you would find to agree with that!

Nor is it current monthly or quarterly revenues that matter so much, but what monthly and quarterly revenues will be looking like in 4, 6 and 12 months.


alj14