moosh, I came across a post you made 5 months ago concerning Estrella's resume that was posted online. You spoke with BJ and she claimed Estrella did not submit that resume. The claim was it was made up by someone, presumably trying to harm the company or Estrella's image. Not sure if that claim was from you or BJ.
It's been 5 months since this was brought to the company's attention. It seems reasonable that during those 5 months the company would have taken steps to get this "fake" resume removed from the site. Any current or potential shareholder doing some background recon on Estrella might conclude that our CEO is shopping for a new job and things might not be going well within the company. Also, as was pointed out here, the resume includes statements of fundings that have not been disclosed to the SEC or shareholders. Shouldn't that be a problem for the company regardless of whether this resume is legitimate or fraudulent?
Even if the company were taking legal action to ascertain who posted the resume, shouldn't the first action be to have it removed? Yet, 5 months after it was brought to the company's attention, Estrella's resume is still posted there.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.