InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 245
Posts 55847
Boards Moderated 12
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: MorningLightMountain post# 63602

Thursday, 07/05/2012 7:55:59 PM

Thursday, July 05, 2012 7:55:59 PM

Post# of 63795
25. Where a securities law violator has enjoyed access to funds over a period of time as a result of his wrongdoing, requiring the violator to pay prejudgment interest is consistent with the equitable purpose of disgorgement. Id. at 1090. The Internal Revenue Service’s delinquent tax rate reflects what it would have cost to borrow a sum of money from the government and therefore reasonably approximates one of the benefits a defendant receives from having access to the proceeds of fraud. See First Jersey, 101 F.3d at 1476.

26. Rivera’s death is not a bar to a disgorgement order. “A civil action for damages commenced by or on behalf of the United States or in which it is interested shall not abate on the death of a defendant but shall survive and be enforceable against his estate as well as against surviving defendants.” 28 U.S.C. § 2404. Several courts have held that a cause of action for violation of Rule 10b-5, sounding in equity and calling for remedial recovery, survives under the statute. See, e.g., Federal Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Fielding, 316 F.Supp. 82, 85 (D. Nev. 1970).

Doc 100 PDF file
https://viewer.zoho.com/docs/xdXlba