Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:02:46 PM
All of that aside, I do have a question - and this is out of total hypothetical curiosity. Let's just say, let's pretend, let's hypothesize, that whatever the float is, there are more shares held by shareholders in their accounts than the float...
Is there any single event that would cause all of those shares to be accounted for? And if that were to happen...all shares in shareholders accounts were tallied up, and it was clear that more shares were owned than the float, clearly there would be a problem. But my question is WHO is responsible for that? Is there any way to prove which MM's were shorting and never covered, or which were selling naked shorts?
I mean, it's nice to fantasize about a huge short squeeze caused by millions of naked short shares or "air" shares, but I'm just asking, even if they're really out there...what would cause them to be brought to light and then who would have to cover?
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM