InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 162
Posts 18884
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: loophole73 post# 125564

Saturday, 09/10/2005 5:45:30 PM

Saturday, September 10, 2005 5:45:30 PM

Post# of 433225
Loop, Good post.

You said, "The Delaware judge and Nok now have big problems as a result of the KYO license. First and foremost, Nok should not have standing as a licensee to challenge any of its now licensed IDCC technology. Even if the Delaware judge fails to follow the law as Judge Lynn attempted and allows Nok standing and subject matter jurisdiction, the law is clear that Nok must challenge the entire portfolio of IDCC preventing Nok from picking and choosing a few patents in its attack. This is a massive undertaking and opens the door for possible cross-actions which Nok so richly deserves."

Let's assume this is correct and the Judge finally makes a favorable decision for IDCC. I thought the weakest link in law would be the USA because murders walk as well as corporate thieves. I know you aren't familiar with UK law but have you heard anything that would indicate their system is more corrupt than ours?

Now what about the 3-G suit in the UK? Did Nokia go after the the whole portfolio?

"Being 'over the hill is much better than being under it!"

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News