It's funny, everyone always says to take emotion out of the equation when it comes to the market...I find that financial articles should be unbiased, poignant and based on sound fact/reason. In reading AF's article, it is very clear to the simplest of minds that there is a motivation for slandering BPAX and a lot of emotion behind his words-which drives the emotion of the simple minded retail investor who reads it. Shorts end up reaping the rewards...
Two outcomes were to come on the fate of libigel- live or die- I'm sure AF and those that pay him to write this drivel sat on two articles, one the gloats that they new it was dead and they were right the entire time had BPAX axed libigel, and one that, well, they published...
Given the great news...which it is really great news, and JTFM really brings up a good point in that this very well could have gone the other direction...and I don't think anyone on this board would've wanted that, I believe that there is some pressure on the shorts to cover and the machines are really driving the price down as a result.
I was surprised regarding how we did today given the news, but not too concerned; I see the value of what this co has to offer and am glad I paid what I paid for my shares, of which I'm holding on to until AF pulls 'em from my cold dead hands...
RG
