e.Digital Corporation (fka EDIG)

[Neverending]

Believe me I want to believe the ruling was flawed I told you I have poured a lot of my life and wealth into this and it killed me. The original examiner did not feel simply using flash memory as the final repository of data was enough as it would be "obvious" to substitute flash for a cassette of other media. Norris then said he was "aware of no prior art that did not use another memory system such as RAM" and he amended his claims saying that flash would be the "sole memory" used in his device. Read the 774 non final rejection from when the patent was applied for. I was hoping that EDIG used RAM in a different way than the prior art did and that was how I justified the investment in EDIG. That is how our research should proceed. How is RAM used differently by EDIG than Kimura, Sharp of Schroder.