InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,344.16
(
0.47%
)
US TECH 100
18,024.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
39,497.54
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
79.49
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,331.91
(
-0.90%
)
Post# of 157299
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

rwehapi2003

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 23
Posts 821
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/24/2006

rwehapi2003

Re: nilremerlin post# 137201

Friday, 05/18/2012 10:48:59 AM

Friday, May 18, 2012 10:48:59 AM

Post# of 157299
Nil, I am wondering about this GSAT issue and the new Navy contract.

It all hinges on how much traffic we are expected to pass throught the LEO constellation and where that traffic is going to orginate.

The GSAT website shows simplex coverage as being pretty good which is good for GTC and the applique side of things which is probably the bulk of the emergency response asset tracking contract.

The Navy contract is a different issue if any of that is going to use the duplex portion of the LEO constellation. We don't know the details of what equipment they are using but the applications mentioned in the PR require two-way communications which would fall under the duplex model.

Maybe the Navy contract is using an entirely different sat constellation from a competitor so there are no concerns?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up