Were all allowed our opinion here, and in MY opinion I think your analyses is WAY off.....First of all, do you have ANY proof that Cheryl has received shares as part of her compensation? Now I understand you can say it's obvious she has been given shares, but I am not asking for speculation here, I am asking for PROOF!!! Second, without said proof, how are we to realistically debate this? honestly, I can go ahead and say she is doing this all out of the kindness of her heart... but, I have no clue if that is the case, why? because there has been NO PR or any other information about the terms of her contract given....
We can debate the reasons why the pps is where it is. but, lets keep it to the facts, deal?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.