InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,618.57
(
0.75%
)
US TECH 100
20,107.60
(
0.99%
)
Dow Jones
39,549.06
(
0.65%
)
Brent Oil
84.91
(
0.25%
)
Bitcoin
57,462.23
(
-0.96%
)
Post# of 141649
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

neophyte184

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 752
Posts 59170
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 08/06/2009

neophyte184

Re: @realToothFairy post# 64682

Sunday, 05/13/2012 12:46:27 AM

Sunday, May 13, 2012 12:46:27 AM

Post# of 141649
A contract is a contract and implies a binding agreement. Why would Shuman agree to essentially be the face of RFMK, if this agreement was so non-committal?? And why would Shuman be advertising this new agreement on her Facebook page if the relationship is as you imply?

I do agree that it might be nice to see the details of the contract but I certainly won't have any doubts if we don't get that info.

GLTY!

Neo

Remember people to only play with the money your wife/husband/significant other/imaginary friend won't disembowel you for should you lose everything if your stock goes the way of the dodo!

JMHO!

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up