InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2010

Re: None

Friday, 04/13/2012 3:57:21 PM

Friday, April 13, 2012 3:57:21 PM

Post# of 98509
EDIT "why would mark leonard reduce the A/S just to turn around and raise it again to sell shares???"

1 It's business as usual on the pinks...

2 Same reason the A/S needed to be raised in the first place... (Cash Flow)

3 The realization that the A/S was reduced too much... Going back to the original 1.5bil would have been satisfactory with the investing public. imo... A simple explanation of the company needing financing for upcoming investments and future positioning would/could have a better outcome vs a full R/S. (the real shares that "matter" werent touched, so it's all for naught investor wise anyway. Hope for the pump expected in the next coming weeks and play it if able.. )

Waiting so long for a self proclaimed "Pro" in the industry that has had enough time to take a bite out of the big boys is considered "sleeping money"....

1 share aapl on may 16th 2011 (top of tytn pump +/- a day) cost $333. Today $609. / TYTN .005 to .0002 (.00018 cost conv. today)

:)

"yes but one cant condem a man for something he hasnt done yet!"

The condemnation is based upon past broken promises and realized losses. No one knows what is in store but history shows the same timeline that tytn has travelled is par for the course for pink companies with or without actual products.

Hopefully for investors this company can pull off continued increasing revenues.... Time will tell!

Till then, the history is all one has to base the future upon.

GL!