Baron Capital Enterprise Inc (BCAP)

[mvp_money]

Email exchange with CEO Matt Dwyer 4/10/2012:



Why did Matt Dwyer say "and yes you will be liable but nice try"

Because in the remainder of my original email (before it was cropped to fit the text sizing of the screen shot to fit the screen and still be large enough to be read) I informed MATT that as long as I didn't publicly expose his email transcripts, i wouldn't be liable for publicly exposing his information. (more on that later)

You can see... he went on to say he would tell his legal council, and told me I should "ask Joe, he has the email and *the name since he wrote them a ck."

Nice job MATT - thanks - and...

You think I didn't already know that? Like i said, ALL of the information is NO longer a secret. The SEC, FINRA, none of these entities have seen the information yet. NOT ONE.

Which reminds me... All these people who believe Matt is "finra approved" for a T/A..
HE IS NOT! Finra has NOTHING to do with a t/a approval. They do however, register and approve Broker-Dealers.

If you check finra's broker deal lists, Matt Dwyer is NOT registered, or affiliated with FINRA, nor his company Baron Capital Ent in anyway whatsoever.

Hey MATT... FINRA has yet to see the information.

Your web, the interconnected scheme of taking over public shells... IS OVER.


BCAP Shareholders, in the email screen-shot above, who is the "JOE" matt is referring to?

This is Joe Elkind. The man who had $484k stolen from him, and Matt was every bit involved... there is no disputing it. Here is the summary of the court case (i have seen the actual legal document of the case):

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/06/41965.htm

In the email screen-shot above, WHY did MATT tell ME that Joe had already written his attorney's a check?

Hey MATT, when I say that it's all been exposed, I mean ALL-OF-IT.

So of course, I know the dealings between Joe Elkind and your attorney: Schneider Weinberger & Beilly LLP and I know Joe paid to get out of the shell RIGH, because he learned you all were schemers, and the stock was a POS scam! (and it STILL IS)

In fact, after you got Joe to buy into the RIGH scam (promising him share valuation in righ so he'd get his $484K back), he sent emails to your attorney, and your attorney emailed him back.

I will NOW provide Joe Elkind's emails to your attorney, and I will NOT provide the email responses from your attorney as per their request:

"This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender or Schneider Weinberger & Beilly LLP (561-362-9595) immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you."

But we will review what Joe Elkind (the man who was scammed out of 484,000 dollars) said to the attorney once he realized he'd been scammed:



I hope you all read that, as it was important.

After Joe sent this email, the attorney responded, calling Joe's attention to:

Section 11.11 of the Share Exchange Agreement, which provides:

“Each of the parties to this Agreement acknowledges and understands that Schneider Weinberger & Beilly LLP prepared this Agreement, served as counsel to RightSmile and Universal in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby and did not represent the interests of Global Branding or any of the Members."

====

This is when Joe knew he would have no representation or help from Matt's attorney (who knew!?) going into court. So Joe replied again, saying:



The attorney, to summarize, shrugged this off. Joe sent one more email:




Great question Joe.

Hey MATT, how many times have you ran the same scam?
In My next post on i-hub, immediately after this post, bcap investors can answer that question for themselves. (skip to that post now to see how SICK the people we're dealing with REALLY are)

But let's not get side tracked.
Matt Dwyer, do you think I'm liable for exposing your email transcripts? Should we 1st show your emails to RIGH's previous CEO, Randy Schneider - how you're telling him exactly WHEN to release the PR for Full Spectrum Media?? How about all the other PR's you ordered to be marketed? You can choose Matt... which ones?

Because see, i'm not liable for anything. I don't know how your information was found, and i don't care. That's NOT my business. All i know - the information was forwarded to my inbox. It's NOT my secret - it's NO ONE'S secret! If you have a problem, go after the person who got his hands on your transcripts - - - I'm just the public.

Matt, Are you going to tell your legal council to add the SEC to your complaints and have them held "liable" after they've reviewed the transcripts? Exactly. Because it's now in the hands of public Matt. The public can't be liable. You are liable for letting your own information reach the public.

What is seen by me (as a previous bcap shareholder) WILL be seen by ALL previous/current bcap/righ/tggi shareholders. It's not my information to with hold.


The first screen shot, but not the last:




I'm going to upload the others when i can. I realize that one was from 2010 but that's because it was the 1st one. MAKE SURE you read my next post which I will make, right about... now! click on replies (top left of this message)



I'll be talking with you all very soon...



MVP_OUT