InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 2134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/16/2009

Re: None

Friday, 04/06/2012 7:23:36 AM

Friday, April 06, 2012 7:23:36 AM

Post# of 53259
ive posted here that the other company im in ipwg has won there decission against the dtcc with the help from the sec. ipwg was chilled for the same reasons and the same people that cxac has been chilled for. ipwg is now going after the dtcc for chilling it for unfounded reasons. why isnt there some kind of thing going on here with cxac?

read:

SEC states "Given the record currently before us, we cannot conclude that DTC provided IPWG with
the procedural safeguards required by Section 17A. DTC's Important Notice fails to meet the
statutory requirements because (1) it was not sent to IPWG itself, but rather to DTC's
Participants; 33 and (2) it merely points to the existence of the Commission's complaint against
certain IPWG shareholders without any additional explanation of why the existence of the
complaint warrants the suspension of clearance and settlement services with respect to IPWG's
securities. Moreover, although Section 17A states that parties such as IPWG must receive an
opportunity to be heard, DTC's November 3, 2009 letter responding to IPWG's request for a hearing states that "DTC declines [IPWG's hearing] request." The Important Notice also does
not specify the expected duration of the suspension, nor does it specify the actions that IPWG must take to remove the suspension."

this link is the dtc decission-----http://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2012/34-66611.pdf
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.