I don't think Suebee and Sunspot are aware that the other one is right.
Having researched nutrition for 28 years now, I've experienced something as fact: Zinc as derived from an inorganic source is worthless when included as a part of a homeopathic medicine, because it contains no enzymes. And since the enzyme is the life spark of every living cell in the universe (animal or vegetable), the human abody masterfully reads all minerals and vitamins quite accurately. Zinc from a plant source is quite useful when mixed with vitamin C (great against an oncoming virus), but ingested from an inorganic source is worthless.
Every study that found zinc to be of no value obviously tested this mineral from a non-living entity. They probably knew ahead of time that it wouldn't work and were merely going about publicizing what they wanted the public to believe. Besides, studies are very expensive, and nowadays they're conducted mostly by pharmaceutical firms with a vested interest in strictly drug therapy. Hence, you classic bias that fools the public.
So why aren't tests done using strictly organic sources, one might wonder. Simple. All minerals and vitamins are more expensive to test when derived from a living source. They're also more expensive to buy as well. Remember that the next time you think all minerals and vitamins are alike. You can fool the mind or the eye, but not the neurological system of the human body. It's too smart for that. Moral? - - - You get what you pay for.
Which begs the question: What are the sources of Mistral's products? I don't know, and they're not telling us.
Loyalhound
P.S. - - - No, I'm no clinical expert, but I've been staking my life on what I just shared. And I can say one thing in defense of the above: I haven't seen a doctor for any reason now for just under 44 years. Life works, friends. Non-life doesn't.
Have a nice day. Boy, we all need a break with this stock, don't we?
