InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2010

Re: None

Thursday, 03/22/2012 5:48:32 PM

Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:48:32 PM

Post# of 98509
..if FINRA Operations believes that one of five explicitly
enumerated factors outlined in Rule 6490 may be triggered, it generally will conduct an in-depth review of the Company-Related Action and may seek additional information or documentation from the issuer or duly authorized representative as outlined above.


This is the key phrase in all the "new info blitz" coming from the hangout...

Not sure some understand it though..

TYTN has some JUNK IN THE TRUNK and the governing body needs to know how much and will it effect investors..

Number 5 sounds familiar...

5. there is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the security.

Could be some banking issues involved? Maybe some 504 action that needed esplainin? "Company enacted" T4T status??
Things dat makes ya go hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

Thank Hvnsangel for pointing this out:
Something "TRIGGERED" FINRA into taking a further look into TYTN hldgs.... Be it pizzpoor application skills or worse...
(we've all seen their pr's and filings... ugh)


The company filed docs. to the state of inc (Col.) giving an "Effective date"... As I had mentioned numerous times prior that date... Anyone who thought they would be trading tytnd on that date were incorrect. The state filing means nothing vs the regulatory body in "what, when and why"!!!! (and the public never know any of those issues short a FOIA submittal/suit or a CEO fession...)

Raising authorized shares then reverse splitting soon after has been a regular process in the pinksheet markets as well an easy one.... Not any more kids!!! If a company isnt squeeky clean... plan on a possible long term process.

So, only the CEO can end all this soap opera BS concerning his company and the messageboards. Playing into the scene isnt helping the companys chance to gain new investors short of junk players.

Now, Yellowstone.... The Yellowstone state SOS has 2 differing results for 2 searches. 1 for Yellowstone tractor company and 2 for Yellowstone tractor. That being corrected is between the company and the state. If not, outdated public information may be distributed unknowingly. (even then, there was a laps from 3-2011 to 7-2011) Some nice looking tractors on that Yellowstone site though, Too bad 95% arent TYTN's.... :)


"I have made posts to contribute to a FACTUALLY-based discussion. Most everything I have written (admittedly aside from "colorful" subjective embellishments on character observations) about TYTAN & \CEO ML can be verified in PR's, filings, etc as I have shown today."

Cmonnnnnnnnnn You know the game better than most... It isnt about facts but the cold Koolaid... As admitted, you also know the CEO will mix and add the ice to that pitcher of cold Koolaid.

Verified PR's and filings....peeshaw... HAHAHAHA


The CEO, if so interested in "message board comments/questions" than riddle me this......... (been questioned many times)
Where are the blanking AUDITED FINANCIALS as promised so long ago??????? It would put much of the "are we there yet" scenereo to rest... Unfortunately, it might put the "TYTN greatest pinky CEO" etc... to rest as well...???? They cant be "that" expensive... or can they?

Looking back I kinda have to thank him for not producing, I might be a bagger right now had I seen auditeds prior the meltdown in 2011..... Tank's Marky... What a pal...

Back at ya'

:)