InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 3673
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/27/2008

Re: doogdilinger post# 183643

Friday, 03/09/2012 3:11:27 PM

Friday, March 09, 2012 3:11:27 PM

Post# of 241038
This comment below that you commonly refer to only describes the difference in what we each believe may happen as far as financing goes. The majority of the companies that accept this toxic financing you refer too are generally scams to begin with, and are only looking to line their pockets with the funds they recieve. In turn the financiers don't care because they will simply hire promoters to hype the stock for their eventual P&D play. On the other hand, when you have a company like Winning Brands who has demonstrated itself in a manner of a real company seeking and having the potential to gain market share in the retail enviornment it becomes a fundamental play, as opposed to your POS momo plays. This behavior has the possibility to attract risk tolerant investors with a broader vision of what could happen if funding wasn't an issue.

It just depends on which angle you are looking at the potential from. momo play or eventual fundamental play.

that's how the pos-land funding world works.