CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

[jimmym4]

Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 8:10-cv-00031-JVS-

Well It SEEMS we have an honest judge out there on our side Hmmmm

MLG v. Central District of California,
Santa Ana

CHRISTOPHER COX, an individual; et
al
ORDER
Defendants - Appellees.

Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner.

The renewed motion for summary affirmance of this appeal is denied
because the arguments raised in the opening brief are sufficiently substantial to
warrant further consideration by a merits panel.

See United States v. Hooton, 693
F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Appellees’ request to stay the briefing schedule pending disposition of the
motion for summary affirmance is denied as moot.

The answering brief is due 30 days after the date of this order. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief.

: MOTION DENIED