"Am I missing something?"
Nothing important except that the second submission is a bad fax from prob. that same machine that threw out that old "voting BS" everyone debated over for a week not long ago....
Oh, and on the first document the CEO's "black" pen didnt work too good so he switched to a blue pen where as it looks that the writing instrument he used on the 2nd submission worked just fine.
As (noquit) posted not too long ago- #77580, the most likely reason for a revised date is the company had to provide more information to FINRA.... Judging from watching this company for a couple yrs now, I dont doubt they were either confused on what was needed or just plain lacking thru ignorance.....
Some were trying to play that the YTO changes are a reason for the revised 3-1-12 date but no support on that was provided..
There are some pinkies out there that are very good at this and a split isnt realized by investors till its almost too late...
TYTN, "did" atleast have the respect to give a heads up on what will happen just didnt follow up on a "buy/sell" by date thru an open public PR..
So, 3-1-12 is the effective date if all is good - meaning one must own shares prior to that date to be included in the R/S... (that is a tytn corp. date, FINRA could wrench that) If not, its trade "tytnd" or wait for the split to be finalized and back to "tytn" before taking a position.. Kinda like a "best if eaten before" date.... (pending on the full yr and 1st Q reports, any date might be kinda stale if bitten into?)
Summing it all up..... The no compete has no bearing on any TYTN dealings just as the T4T is not an option for any "sane" company if even optionable.... TYTN started 2004 well after any no compete deal was null, TYTN used 504's early 2011 on thru 3rd Q as they also raised the A/S late 2ndQ. The 504's very well lead to the Trade for Trade status but the A/S being raised 4 times the original prob didnt help.....
USC COWBOY....Opinion time...
In my opinion..... This guy never wanted to go public and wants to get tytn int. back private ... If the news post R/S does not show increasing revenues with sustainability... Well, the PPS may tank giving a greater discounted price from trip zip 1 with the lowered share amount giving way for the company to be taken private by any entity with the right amount of cash (for the commons) and leverage over the preferred shareholders.... hint hint...
Might be wrong and Poland just started 13 new TYTN dealerships in Warsaw???
Hmmmmmmmmm
"The implement link works"
Cmon, the whole website is but junk..(opinion?).. More pics than real info and about as amaturish as it gets for a "public" company.... One that has investors MONIES to maintain operations..
The site has no "corporate nor professional" look/feel about it.... If the CEO is not willing to pay for a truely professional updated website, one that will provide more info about products than just oversized pics with old youtube vids...(along with some dopey smile at the camera CEO pose) What makes an interested buyer, one that has been thru the competitions "real" corporate websites stay interested????
Enough.....
Good Luck, maybe they will show a profit? play the pump if available. blah blah blah....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.........
:)
