EDIT below: "....maligned and castigated by many here for increasing the A/S and that leading to an increase in the O/S, screaming "dilution" from every hilltop without proof."
WHAT??????????
The proof is in the financial reports....... No if's and's or but's about what the company has recordedand released to the public!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The company was almost out of the original 1.5 bil A/S (Q1 2011) then increased to 6.5 bil A/S in Q2 as the O/S flew to 3.25 bil... by end of Q 3...
That is called dilution.......!
"..cry also has been that this "dilution" and huge increase in the A/S triggered the need for T4T trading rules."
Or........ the 504's the owner used for to fund operations/product etc... could have triggered the T4T since FINRA finds them untasty to say the least.
Does the public have any info on the 504 funding?
(it's quicker than going the legal public company way though)
"..believe he chose the increase A/S as the bullet in the gun to eliminate the shorters with fake "Air shares" by letting them hang themselves."
Air shares, ghost shares, naked shorts... Yadda yadda yadda... See, sometimes when someone decides to sell as someone buys, the brokerages may not have enough shares on hand/under their NCC acct, so a certain amount will have to be borrowed from another. The brokerage must report these shares as "short" because they borrowed.... There is no proof in the public eye that any illegal shorting or significant failure to delivers have occured...
Scare tactics... typical pink dilution tool!!!!!!! If anything, the company may have sold a bit too much around the 1.5 bil A/S time period forcing the quick increase of the A/S to over 4 times the original number..
"Good work Mark, we will get to the cheese, just a little later than we originally envisioned as we deal with vermin."
HAHAHA.... 2004 to 2012
"Maybe - perfectstorm seems to think it's been moved to 3/1/2012. No evidence other than his post though."
There is evidence of the 3-1-12 date....
UNREAL...
In the end anyone in at say .003 from the last pump n dump will soon need .45 to break even...(hope a majority were able to average down since then?) The PPS will be 0.015 to 0.03 post reverse split if it isnt pumped or painted the day/s prior... Gonna need some damn good news/revs to jump that high post R/S.
EDIT (via censorship):
"verify it by comparing the obo and nobo list to the TA register."
(bet most have no idea what those letters mean)
Anyway,(IMO)
Shhhhhhh.... Ya cant give away all the actual legal business methods to performing as a real public company, one that might be interested in its real investors, on what it "should or could do" concerning the past, current - future investors. But then, dis is da pinkies.....
(atleast charge a fee for that kind of info)....
In the end:
Facts are facts........ Opinions are for naught contained within the use of company numbers, not future outlook, but taken from "public records"...... (Opinions based upon said facts seem to have been proven worthy though)
Ex:
FACT: A/S was raised.. Opinion: lower PPS expected.. VALID
FACT: Bad Q-3 numbers.. Opinion: even lower PPS expected.. VALID
FACT: A/S 6.5 billion.. Opinion: future R/S expected... VALID
Waiting on the "full year" report as well the 1st Q 2012 not long after... One never knows, maybe a new set of opinions will be formed based upon new facts????? (ahahahahahahahah) sure......
Still waiting on them there Audited Financials promised how long ago now??????????????????
Nice!!!!
:)
AI
