Second, informative letter to M. Buks...(oxymoron)
> Dear Ms. Buks,
>
> Although I hope you will pardon the tone of my last
> correspondence it, still in all, did relate my
> thoughts and feelings on the situation at hand. In
> turn also depicted my trepidations as to how the
> investment I and others have made here has been
> manhandled, so to speak, in the past two months. My
> lack of investment expertise notwithstanding, even I
> know that it is wholly unnatural for an issue to
> act/react the way this one has. Especially given the
> untold wealth, albeit based on potential at present,
> connections and partnering ERHC has and will enjoy.
>
> From what I understand, due to those on several
> message boards, you had more than less promissed
> that you and or the company would be doing a better
> job of shareholder relations in the future. If true,
> it has to this point in time not materialized and
> therefore, in my mind, is a total and absolute
> falsehood. That, coupled with the fact that I've not
> gotten a response to my prior email, regardless of
> it's tone, is disconcerting enough to where I felt
> the need to push on in my attempt to seek answers
> elsewhere.
>
> In that vein, as I had mentioned last time, I have
> contacted the SEC and since, yesterday, have
> followed that with an online correspondence to my
> local Congressman, Pete Sessions here in Dallas,
> with CC's going to our state Senators and the
> Houston Chronicle.
>
>
> Sincerely, Lou Sieber
>
> ps: Believe it or not, this is not a condemnation of
> the company's practices as a whole or at least I
> hope it does not run that way. But rather an attempt
> to make sure nothing else sours this investment for
> the rest of us. Keep in mind that as much as ERHC
> may be Sir Offor's in title, it is first and
> foremost publicly held and therefore responsible to
> those vested in it.
>
At the very least, do no harm
