Copper King Mining Corporation fka CPRKQ

[cloud9]

Thanks for the cut and paste, my responses are in red.

I KNOW that Nether wasn't a CPRK CEO because I've been a shareholder and have studied the historical data. You posted he was. Where is your proof? When the Nethers pumped this shell they sent out many a CPRK boucheres...printed on them were the signature Darrell Nether CEO~~~
And where is your proof of these so call brochures with his signature as CPRK CEO? I STILL see absolutely no proof.

I also KNOW the transfer agents list does not show your favorite subject as majority shareholders nor does it show they have a controlling interest. I know this because the ESHC has a copy. You said they were majority shareholders. Where is your proof? Well if the ESHC has a copy..why can't they release the list? My proof is that they won't so I stand by my statement!
The ESHC has nothing to gain by altering the majority shareholders position and to assert that they did or would is misleading. I trust the ESHC's list rather than a random post on a public message board.

I KNOW the ESHC has a proxy service list which has determined they are not majority shareholders. You said they were. Proof? Where is your proof??I STAND BY MY STATEMENT
See response directly above.

I also KNOW that stock options do split, check with investopedia since you posted they did not. With the reverse that would leave them with 200k shares or $60 worth on a good day. Show proof of your assertion that they dont split. You show me proof that the Nethers didn't get millions of shares from stock options..who cares if they do or don't split..they ripped them off from shareholders!proof is in those returns (schedule D)
That's quite a bit of spin in your statement. YOU are the one who posted that stock options DO NOT split (and you even erroneously treated the shares as a forward split) when in fact they DO. YOUR WORDS: "note;stock options don't split."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72092516

I KNOW the radio show has not been on the air in years, yet you said its on the air still. Where is your proof? Never said the station is on air..what i did say is that the Nethers used this a vehicle to pump and dump millions of the stock options
No, you said the radio station was still promoting CPRK. YOUR WORDS: "the radio station is still promoting CPRK"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=71483985

I KNOW there is no court in America where the Nethers are testifying because I have checked to satisfy my curiosity. Yet you know better? Where is your proof? You know the Nethers have been a snitch for years ..PROVE ME WRONG! They are talking to this day (feds).. why because they legally stole millions of shares from shareholders leaving everyone a empty bag..proof is in those returns (schedule D)
Eveything youve posted can be your OPINION, but frankly I've read nothing that would persuade me, or that has factual evidence supporting your various claims. You've yet to give a court, a pacer number or any form or fashion of PROOF. Since you're the one making the accusations, the burden of proof is on you.

Last but not least, I KNOW the SEC filed litigation complaints against CPRK's Blum, Dotson & Bennett, and no one else, yet you think they aren't to blame? I have yet to see any shape or form of proof, nor do I see any verification that the Nethers currently have anything to do with the company. THE MAIN REASON THIS SHELL IS NOT TRADING ..IS BECAUSE OF THE CONFLICT WHAT THE NETHERS SAY AND WHAT BLUM, DOTSON SAY TO THE FEDS!
Thats incorrect. If you have proof of an amended filing by the SEC stating this, post your proof. Otherwise it will stand that Blum, Dotson and Bennett had litigation releases filed against them by the SEC, and No one else.

Where is your proof? The Q being added only lends credence to my assertion that Blum, Dotson, and Bennett are to blame and I believe the SEC agrees with ME. THE Q WAS ADDED BECAUSE NETHERS,BLUM AND DOTSON RIPPED OFF SHAREHOLDERS WHILE SELLING TO THE PUBLIC THAT THERE WAS COPPER IN THOSE ROCKS!
Once again, Blum, Dotson and Bennett had litigation releases filed against them by the SEC, and No one else. Nethers was never a CPRK CEO as you've stated numerous times in the past. If you don't agree with the SEC, call them and give your PROOF.