Kan U...Unwind? U Kan here!

[OlafKjelldsen]

Wrong you don't have the faintest idea of what your talking about

I have yet to see you do much of anything but attack people. Do you have anything substantial to post about the company?

Not too complex at all!!

Kind of begs the quesiton of why you post responses that demonstrate that you've completely missed the meaning.

Nice to know that you can count!! 50 zillion?? Really??

It's called being facetious. You're jeering and taunting like an angry child. I guess if you don't have any info or facts and are stuck holding a bag of worthless shares there isn't much else to do.

Who are you to say "what" exposure makes an impression??

An honest person with more than a little background in advertising and marketing.

Actually, it's pretty simple to stage a test that proves my point. I'm going to pick a race that a Bebevco-sponsored vehicle races in this year at random after it's aired. Then I am going to pick a random vehicle in the race and ask you (or anyone else) to name a decal in a location I specify. Since you seem to think that everyone remembers every little insignificant decal on every vehicle, you'll have no trouble remember the one I pick, right?

So it really doesn't matter but"your going to look"?? Of course this is not equivalent to a Superbowl commercial!!! DUH!!! WOW,alot of dumb people putting advertising on race cars(which no one can see,because they are going too fast)!!! LOL

Where did I say it doesn't matter? I'm going to watch for it so I can see how much TV time it gets so I can speak with authority on the matter. See, I actually take the time to do research instead of just running my mouth attacking people. When I post something, I have something to back it up.

The 'superbowl commercial' comparison is just hyperbole. I have been here every year when Bebevco goes racing and the exact same bunch of posts claiming huge exposure from racing sponsorship appear like clockwork. I am answering them before they are posted because I know they are coming. Just like Weber trying to tell everyone how much it's in their best interest, then nothing happens to benefit anyone except him getting his jollies at the race track.

Another common spin tactic is listing coke, pepsi, coors, bud, red bull, etc as though every sponsor is elevated to that level just by being there. So, I go down the list of sponsors to places like "Fred's Towing" to prove that some greaseball podunk garage who just wants to see their name go around on the car spends the cash for vanity, but they aren't going to be a global megacorporation as a result. The obscure, low-level advertising Bebevco does serves no practical marketing purpose. If you think it does serve a purpose, stop complaining to me and write to your CEO and ask him for clear, specific and verifiable proof of how BBDA's racing expenditure has benefited shareholders.

So with your valuable knowledge,how much money did the CEO waste???

How the heck should I know? Ask him! I have a good idea what it costs to run and/or sponsor a race car. Weber claims to have a lot of connections, too bad they are all has-beens, never-was and losers that nobody cares about. Getting a good deal on a pile of crap just means you have cheap crap.

The company just might get in the winners circle!! Can't win if your not in the race!!

I'll wait until it isn't set up like a scam.

You bailed?? Who would have thought!! But Olaf i'm not ready to declare this race over just yet. There is a caution out and this race will resume very soon!!

Right. I bought shares in April 2009 based on false pretenses and sold them a couple months later when I figured out the CEO wasn't being completely honest. That's how long it took me and in almost three years, he hasn't done anything to convince me otherwise.
If you want to buy shares and hold them thinking the company is going to succeed, go right ahead! I hope you make lots of money.

I guess I really should have said "one lap at a time" LOL

I know what they are trying to achieve doesn't happen overnight and i do acknowledge what they've done that can be verified, but I can't say I see progress commensurate with their claims and there is no justification for the level of dilution shareholders have had to endure. IMO.

Just out of curiousity, I noticed you left this out of my post:

Like the steps it's taken to grow the share count from 5.4 billion to the equivalent of at least 850 billion? Those kind of steps? Or do you mean the steps it has taken to make the shares worth 1/1000 of what they were to begin with? Or the steps taken to hire a convicted penny stock scammer to represent your company?

Is it because you are pretending that's not happening? You keep repeating all this positive stuff that's nothing but fluff and dreams, but you totally dodge the things that I posted which are cold, hard, indisputable facts that point at what a worthless scammy turd this company really is. I'm not afraid to look at the facts surrounding this company. Why are you?