InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 172
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/20/2011

Re: bradipogs post# 55390

Wednesday, 02/15/2012 10:09:25 AM

Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:09:25 AM

Post# of 60937
Yes, the company had a plan to remove the source of the lack of success the company had by arranging the shareholder vote, however they left an opening for that source to put this in Delaware court where all the dirty laundry was right there on the floor. I also want to see max value per share, but remember that will be a one time shot and then the end. The source of this fiasco should have walked away after his undeniable rebuke from the shareholders who did vote. You seem like a reasonable person that shares the view that this company seemed to have turned the corner before it was derailed. The theories about patent suppression and backdoor payments from Diac or telecoms are unfounded, but if it is revealed that it did happen the receiver will have no jurisdiction with that. That will be a criminal case in another venue. Use your God given common sense to sort out how we ended up like this.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.