InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 11566
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/24/2011

Re: Fernace post# 50392

Sunday, 02/12/2012 11:04:03 AM

Sunday, February 12, 2012 11:04:03 AM

Post# of 113927
the U.S.D.A. has the MIT1000, thats a fact.
their own scientists helped design and test it.

who do we think built it?

Did the USDA waste their time testing a piece of junk?!

i dont believe they would even be able
to slide that past their own boss,
let alone risk their jobs
by doinbg just that.

do you know what would happen to their budget
if they did that ????

do you see that having their scientists involved
is quite the opposite of what you suggest "a fraud
about who is building the device"

again, you're not talking about the integrity
of some company that doesnt need to be responsible
for any of its actions,

but a governmental agency

whose "actions" is critiqued by the entire congress.
whose every dollar of funding is scrutinized by regulations.
whose own scientists would report them for
funding, research, testing and using a piece of junk.
For years no less!

Now follow my line of reasoning here.

Can the USDA keep lieing about it?
Can they allow this device to be sold throughout the USA
to the very companies that "THEY" are RESPONSIBLE to TEST at ????!!!!!!!

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

empathecially NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


thank you!
$MMTC
imho
BSW