InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 2684
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2001

Re: iamshazzam post# 37135

Tuesday, 08/02/2005 9:14:52 AM

Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:14:52 AM

Post# of 78729
iamshazzam: Re: Maybe "patience" - the word I got, true or not, was that a "source" at the SEC said last week that it had been approved and the notification was in the mail.

OK. Let's look at the facts. The quiet period is not over until the registration statement is declared effective by the SEC. According to the PR, the "registration statement relating to the potential resale of its stock by some of its stockholders was declared effective last evening". That was yesterday, August 1. It was declared effective yesterday, the quiet period was over yesterday.

Yet, despite that, we had an e-mail from Ray posted here that was dated July 21, which stated clearly and in unambiguous terms that the quiet period was over - ten days ago.

I am trying to be polite and respectful, but I am just so amazed that you continue to make excuses for this company when it seems clear that Ray flat-out lied to Buy_Low in that e-mail. The fact is that the quiet period was not over at the time that Ray said it was.

Why can't you call a spade a spade?

As a side note, the first timeline for performance as stated at the SHM was to get the RIM web site up and running yesterday. That has not happened.

Excuses?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.