Once again, the self proclaimed master prognosticators and gurus on this thread have shown their total lack of being in possession of any material facts.
CYGX appealed the verdict and it could be (see Paul-NESS, I forewarned you) that they are trying to avoid having the clock start on the court imposed deadline to deliver product. It might be that they can't deliver what they are obligated to deliver and that could be the reason they are spending another $70,000.00 of our funds to delay the inevitable.
AVGI could have been a God-send to CYGX. By now, large animal (equine) testing could have been completed and a product could have been brought to market thereby establishing a cash flow ... you know, the one some of the psycobabblers keep mumbling about being just around the corner.
I suppose a few of our regulars will want to go into attack mode over this post ... of course they KNOW absolutely nothing about the intrique that has accompanied this fiasco. And they have NO FIRST HAND information concerning the litigation that was spawned when CYGX decided to sue the first company they had licensed. Ignorance, of course, will not prevent their babbling on about that of which they know not.
Somebody call AVGI and ask them if they've received product.
They'd probably be more open to answering the question than Malcomb would.
AI
