InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 398
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: None

Sunday, 07/24/2005 9:00:29 AM

Sunday, July 24, 2005 9:00:29 AM

Post# of 432924
There has been some discussion that Nok's claim that the award is not enforceable has to do with E/SE also being a 3G trigger. Nok has already filed that the arb has nothing to do with 3G. One question I have is don't they have a valid argument if the arb was only about 2G? Then again the ICC has some very smart people working for them and I would think they would not make the 3G connection without a valid reason(s)! So what could those reasons be? Is it possible that there was something in the 2G contract that also connected 3G?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News