InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 4034
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/01/2009

Re: wall_street61 post# 354164

Thursday, 12/29/2011 11:36:08 AM

Thursday, December 29, 2011 11:36:08 AM

Post# of 730815
I partially agree, but mostly disagree. Yes, the judge's reasoning won't be "I can't put them in 18 because..."; however, if she does put them in Class 18, I would wager she expects some sort of compensation be offered to DIMEs through some modifications to the POR. How can she force a group into a class that is entirely skipped over in the new POR? How can she legally violate APR without DIMEs consent? Do you have any examples of where such a thing has occurred in Walrath's court (or another)?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News