InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[JimLur]

About why this binding arbitration and the results the ICC has given isn't being accepted by Nokia and why they would be willing to give up their prepaid discount to carry it on further.

Right now I'm confused and wonder if IDCC would have been better off to put this issue in a rocket docket court instead of using the ICC? I'm not questioning how management handled this thing I'm just wondering what value is there in binding arbitration when the loser doesn't comply.

How far would this issue be along right now in a rocket docket court? We now have two years vested in trying to collect and the issue is just starting in the courts.

Let's assume right now IDCC withdraws it suit in New York. Does Nokia just ignore what decision the ICC has made? What help would IDCC have got from the ICC if they didn't file a suit?

If the ICC can't afford any help to companies when they provide decisions they shouldn't call them binding arbitrations.

I'm sure I don't understand this issue the way a lawyer does and looking forward to some comments.