InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1829
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: whizzeresq post# 119273

Monday, 07/18/2005 2:29:36 PM

Monday, July 18, 2005 2:29:36 PM

Post# of 432775
"Nokia may claim that any dispute over those figures should be resolved by another arbitration so that the current award should not yet be enforced. " - I agree this may be Nok's postition.

However, it seems IDCC has Nok's sales reports for 2002 through 2003, so there may be no valid dispute over those past due amounts:

"Based on the royalty rates established by the Tribunal, InterDigital estimates that Nokia's royalty obligations ..January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2003 will be approximately $112 million...The above amounts are exclusive of awarded interest...Estimates of POST-2003 royalty obligations are based on third party and InterDigital's estimates of Nokia's sales of covered products for the applicable periods.."

So, it seems IDCC does have Nok sales reports for 2002-2003, and those amounts, although indicated as IDCC estimates, may be actual past due amounts based on Nok's sales reports?

TIA,
Corp_Buyer



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News