InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[Mooseo1]

Data. It still seems to me that Nokia should have thought about that before they signed a contract for IPR with IDCC. But it is obvious now Nokia NEVER intended to pay IDCC.
Apparently they were trying to munipulate the international IPR world markets but now got bit in the ass by their endeavors.

IMO Nokia signed on the dotted line and now they are legally obligated to pay no matter how they feel about the situation these days.

If they don't pay and are not made to pay. They IMO are setting a precedence for all companies never to have to pay for anything after they've signed a binding contract. Not to mention losing in an arbitration award court after agreeing to be legally binded by one.

IMO this strikes at the heart of the faith and trust of the world judical system and world trade if Nokia doesn't pay.

If Nokia doesn't pay, all of Nokia's assets in this country need to be confiscated and then given the boot from doing business in the United States again.

I think if something doesn't happen in a few months a letter writting campaign to our government representives is in order.

No matter how you try to sweeten Nokia's wrongfully, borderline crimminal munipulation of the world IPR market place, by not honoring legally binding contracts. NOKIA IS IN THE WRONG! No matter what Nokia think's of the situation now.

Nokia needs to be brought to justice. If this situation needs to be brought up to the attention of our United States Congress as an example of unfair world free trade and an ineffective world judical system, then so be it!

Moose