InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 148
Posts 11143
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2005

Re: es1 post# 346438

Friday, 11/25/2011 6:56:50 AM

Friday, November 25, 2011 6:56:50 AM

Post# of 729970
es1: I think the answer is fairly simple. Imagine you are the judge and you've just ordered mediation. If a party withdraws from the GSA, then the entire mediation exercise could easily become worthless because a whole range of issues would be opened up again before mediation reaches its conclujsion.

So she was requesting the FDIC and others to "extend" the GSA (meaning extend the "no withdrawal" period for a sufficient amount of time to cover the time that would be needed by mediation). However, if she does not get an affirmative extension from any party, the GSA would still be in effect until a party actually witdraws. If a settlement is reached and a new POR is submitted to her, and no one has yet withdrawn from the GSA at that time, she can go ahead and initiate the confirmation process for the POR.


Any legal analysis I post may not be relied upon by anyone for any
purpose. If you want legal advice you can rely on, hire a lawyer.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News