InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 321
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2002

Re: lostcowboy post# 7099

Sunday, 01/19/2003 1:59:23 PM

Sunday, January 19, 2003 1:59:23 PM

Post# of 47300
Hi LC (and Hi aptus)

I am just pondering this, and more for my amusement than from any real wish to change the AIM algorithm. I already did the same test and found how raising PC after a sell instead of after a buy had a severe impact when you consider the Lichello cycle. But for obvious reasons this isn't very informative: the Lichello cycle is almost custom built to make the trading side of AIM shine. (Real trading systems like Vortex or X_Dev do even better.) But for my Nasdaq100 sheet this variation actually was beneficial, so things remain undecided. Perhaps someone with a huge database and a good backtest engine could do some number crunching. (Yes, that's you, aptus. I hope you are interested!)

Regards,

Karel

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.