InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 212
Posts 22564
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/19/2010

Re: greedy__malone post# 17854

Friday, 11/11/2011 11:53:09 AM

Friday, November 11, 2011 11:53:09 AM

Post# of 22918
Great, you are researching LEAT as our ie: pink suspension to grey & back to pink.

I believe that I am going to take all of your very imperative points & apply common logic to them. yeah LEAT was 'providing audited financials to pink sheets," "had an actual structure that included a BOD, a specific product" & had "actual business operations." They got caught up in what the sec found to be a "spam campaign." Took quite a bit of time to rectify as well. But all of your points lead me to believe how EASY it will be for a disclosed public shell to satisfy finra. Seriously on a shell (looking to merger), how many specifics could there be?? Like little, very few?? Now you are providing beautiful support for the concise reasoning attached to anwm's suspension: Questions have arisen concerning the adequacy and accuracy of publicly available information about the company.