InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: hokies post# 49770

Tuesday, 11/08/2011 11:48:36 AM

Tuesday, November 08, 2011 11:48:36 AM

Post# of 60937

No, Williams blew it when it got personal for him against Daic. When he put his own ego ahead of the company and chose to sue Daic with exactly zero evidence. They lawyers had nothing to fight with. Zip. The company had no chance. Ms. Pierce came in and quickly realized that and managed to get a decent settlement despite the mess Williams put the company in. I call that talent.



Wow, is that revisionist history or what. You realize, of course, that the original purpose of the state case was to stop the sale of the patent -- that if he had not filed the action we would not have the patent at all -- you do understand that, correct?

You also understand that the burden of proof in an equity action when asking or immediate injunction relief is extremely high and that, if he had nothing (like the company had when they asked for the immediate relief against Williams based on the company records) that the court will not grant that relief. The standard is a substantial chance of success in the underlying action. For the laymen, it means that we had a solid case that we should have won. And all this was before Ms. Pierce's time.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.